Regent Leisuretime Limited v Skerrett [2006] EWCA 1184 is a lovely reliance on counsel case. You can read a precis here.
Entries from November 2006
Solicitor succeeds on reliance on counsel defence
November 28th, 2006 · No Comments
Tags: Negligence · defences
Unrepresented woman ordered to pay costs of statute barred case
November 28th, 2006 · No Comments
Wells’s Case [2006] VCAT 2370 (Senior Member Howell, 16 November 2006)
Mrs Wells's case, also the subject of the previous post, was struck out under s. 75 of the VCAT Act, 1998 for having been brought out of time. Mr Howell found that the case was "lacking in substance" because it was statute barred and ordered [...]
Tags: Negligence · VCAT Act · defences
Res judicata: VCAT strikes out case previously decided by Legal Profession Tribunal
November 27th, 2006 · No Comments
Wells's Case [2006] VCAT 2370 (Senior Member Howell, 16 November 2006)
I have always thought I was the only person in the world who held the view that an unsuccessful claimant in the Legal Profession Tribunal was not allowed, despite s. 133(2) of the Legal Practice Act, 1996 to have a second go in the courts, [...]
Tags: Fair Trading Act · Legal Practice Act · Negligence · VCAT Act · defences · two bites at the cherry
The barrister and the trust monies saga ends in 6 month holiday
November 25th, 2006 · No Comments
Update: 14 October 2007 The Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal, and the High Court refused special leave to appeal too, on 5 October 2007.
In Victorian Bar Inc v DAP, [2006] VCAT 2293 Judge Bowman, Tony Southall QC and T Harper suspended the barrister's practising certificate for 6 months and ordered him to pay [...]
Tags: Discipline · Misconduct · costs · procedure · trust monies
The administration of justice ground for restraining solicitors from acting summarised
November 25th, 2006 · 1 Comment
In Geelong School Supplies Pty Ltd v Dean [2006] FCA 1404, the facts and outcome of which are described in the previous post, Justice Young went to some lengths to summarise the law on the third basis articulated by Brooking JA in Spincode for restraining solicitors from acting. The relevant parts of the decision are [...]
Federal Court reiterates administration of justice as a ground for restraining solictiors from acting
November 25th, 2006 · 1 Comment
Geelong School Supplies Pty Ltd v Dean [2006] FCA 1404Justice Neil Young, who has just resigned after less than a year in the job as a Federal Court judge in order to return to the bar, took the exceptional step of restraining a solictor from continuing to act in order to protect the administration of [...]
Tags: Uncategorized
Chairman, Full Legal Profession Tribunal criticised for abusing solicitor in misconduct prosecution
November 24th, 2006 · No Comments
In B (A Solicitor) v Victorian Lawyers RPA Ltd (2002) 6 VR 642 (Ormiston, Charles and Batt JJA), the majority criticised the Chairman of the Full Legal Profession Tribunal for retorting to the solicitor's submission that "These proceedings are a full time occupation for me" with "Occupation or obsession, Mr [G]?". They said it was [...]
Tags: Discipline · Legal Practice Act · appeals · procedure
Procedural fairness: "Murray letters" considered by Victorian Court of Appeal
November 24th, 2006 · No Comments
B (A Solicitor) v Victorian Lawyers RPA Ltd (2002) 6 VR 642 (Ormiston, Charles and Batt JJA)
The Law Institute corresponded with the solicitors in this matter between 1998 and October 2000. The CEO Ian Dunn, wrote what is known in the game as "a Murray letter" on 16 October 2000. That is a letter summarising [...]
Tags: "question of law" · Discipline · Legal Practice Act · Misconduct · appeals · natural justice · procedure · prosecutorial failures · prosecutors' duties · regulators' duties
The great delegation debacle: B (A solicitor) v Victorian Lawyers RPA Ltd
November 24th, 2006 · No Comments
B (A Solicitor) v Victorian Lawyers RPA Ltd (2002) 6 VR 642 (Ormiston, Charles and Batt JJA)
The Law Institute of Victoria Limited used to be named Victorian Lawyers RPA Ltd. It, and the Victorian Bar, were the only two RPAs (Recognised Professional Associations) set up under the Legal Practice Act, 1996, which allowed for an [...]
Tags: Discipline · Legal Practice Act · jurisdiction · procedure · prosecutorial failures · regulators' duties
Bowman J suggests no power in Legal Profession Tribunal to reopen hearing
November 22nd, 2006 · No Comments
In K v Legal Services Board [2006] VCAT 2303 (see previous post) Bowman J was critical of, and did not follow Law Institute of Victoria Limited v Michel (T0211 of 2004), a decision of the Full Legal Profession Tribunal chaired by Judge Dee to grant a rehearing after having made a final order, on the [...]
Tags: Uncategorized

