Stocovaz v Fung [2007] NSWCA 199 is a rare thing: a superior court decision about motor vehicle property damage litigation, more commonly known as ‘crash ‘n’ bash’. The New South Wales Court of Appeal said that the plaintiff is entitled to the amount actually paid for repairs unless the defendant can establish that it was ‘extravagant’ in the sense of being outside the range of amounts which a reasonable person would pay for the repairs. There seems to be a policy to avoid clogging up the courts with cases which take a comparatively long time to hear, but amount to squabbles between insurers over differences of a few thousand dollars. Carter Newell’s case note is here.
See also:
- Once the time for taxation runs out, the solicitor can sue on the bill as a simple debt
- No issue waiver of 2nd solicitor’s advice on regretted settlement made necessary by 1st solicitor’s negligent advice
- The 20% reduction in Worksafe case costs: what does it mean?
- Chief Justice realises legal system’s too expensive!
- No estimate of fees at outset results in 15% being knocked off
0 responses so far ↓
There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.
Leave a Comment