<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interest on costs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyerslawyer.net/2010/02/02/interest-on-costs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyerslawyer.net/2010/02/02/interest-on-costs/</link>
	<description>Stephen Warne on professional negligence, regulation and discipline around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 04:27:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcellous</title>
		<link>http://lawyerslawyer.net/2010/02/02/interest-on-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-14071</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcellous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyerslawyer.net/?p=1711#comment-14071</guid>
		<description>Section 5(7) of the Limitations Act doesn&#039;t have quite the effect you seem to suppose.  You can enforce a judgment by means of execution (as opposed to commencing fresh proceedings - quite frankly, it&#039;s hard to think when you would ever have to do that) for as long as you like or, more accurately, for as long as the court, in its discretion, will let you.

See:

&lt;em&gt;Dennehy v Reasonable Endeavours Pty Ltd, in the matter of Dennehy (A Bankrupt)&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2003/158.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;[2003] FCAFC 158&lt;/a&gt;

It&#039;s a scandal and will come as a shock to many, but that&#039;s apparently the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Section 5(7) of the Limitations Act doesn&#8217;t have quite the effect you seem to suppose.  You can enforce a judgment by means of execution (as opposed to commencing fresh proceedings &#8211; quite frankly, it&#8217;s hard to think when you would ever have to do that) for as long as you like or, more accurately, for as long as the court, in its discretion, will let you.</p>
<p>See:</p>
<p><em>Dennehy v Reasonable Endeavours Pty Ltd, in the matter of Dennehy (A Bankrupt)</em> <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2003/158.html" rel="nofollow">[2003] FCAFC 158</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a scandal and will come as a shock to many, but that&#8217;s apparently the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
