In Anfuso’s Case [2007] VCAT 1690, Member Butcher of VCAT’s Legal Practice List gave summary judgment for a solicitor by reference to the principles of accord and satisfaction. The solicitor had sued for her fees in the Magistrates’ Court. She got default judgment against her former client, and got an order that his employer pay [...]
Entries Tagged as 'defences'
Accord and satisfaction as a defence to a professional negligence claim
October 13th, 2007 · No Comments
Tags: Litigation estoppels · Negligence · defences
NSW Supreme Court says solicitor immune from suit for out of court omissions
October 12th, 2007 · 1 Comment
Update, 12 March 2009: The advocates’ immunity part of the trial judge’s reasons did not really survive on appeal: Coshott v Barry [2009] NSWCA 34. Quite where that leaves the authority of Keefe v Marks (1989) 16 NSWLR 713, a decision of Chief Justice Gleeson, remains to be worked out. Justice of Appeal Ipp with [...]
Tags: Advocates' Immunity · Barristers' immunity · Discipline · Forensic immunity · Negligence · defences
Federal Court Dishes Out Some Serious Proportionate Liability Interpretation
August 21st, 2007 · No Comments
Melbourne’s Justice Middleton has dished out some serious interpretation of the Victorian and federal proportionate liability regimes and, what’s even more useful, their interrelationship, in Dartberg Pty Ltd v Wealthcare Financial Planning Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1216, a decision at an early stage of the proceedings. It is a classy judgment in a matter [...]
Tags: Negligence · Proportionate Liability · defences
Justice Hollingworth unpicks the proportionate liability provisions
August 20th, 2007 · No Comments
In Woods v De Gabriele [2007] VSC 177, Justice Hollingworth has tentatively unpicked some difficult parts of the federal and Victorian proportionate liability provisions in Part IVAA of the Wrongs Act, 1958 (the relevant provisions are here), and in the Corporations Act, 2001 (Cth) and Australian Securities and Investments Act, 2001 (Cth) Division 2, Subdivision [...]
Tags: Negligence · Proportionate Liability · defences
Solicitors’ settlement advice immune from suit
August 18th, 2007 · No Comments
I know for a fact that the profession does not understand the extent of the advocates’ immunity which is set out in the decision of the majority in D’Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid [2005] 223 CLR 1. Not uncommonly I see lawyers’ negligence claims arising out of litigation being defended without claiming the immunity, [...]
Tags: Advocates' Immunity · Barristers' immunity · Forensic immunity · Negligence · defences
Doctor’s opinion not given in trade or commerce so VCAT had no jurisdiction
June 27th, 2007 · No Comments
In a landmark decision with profound implications for VCAT’s Fair Trading Act, 1958 jurisdiction over lawyer-client disputes about professional negligence and fees, a Deputy President of VCAT has recognised that it did not have jurisdiction to hear a former client’s misleading and deceptive conduct claim brought against ‘a professional’ in the traditional sense of [...]
Tags: Fair Trading Act · Negligence · VCAT · defences · doctors · jurisdiction · procedure
Here’s a copy of the Vic Wrongs Act 1958’s proportionate liability provisions
June 24th, 2007 · No Comments
PART IVAA PROPORTIONATE LIABILITY
Tags: Negligence · Proportionate Liability · defences
Summary dismissal in a solicitors’ negligence claim at VCAT
May 28th, 2007 · 3 Comments
Skinner’s Case [2007] VCAT 917, a claim against a leading labour law firm, was for some reason heard in VCAT’s Civil List. A more likely list would have been the Legal Practice List, given that it was a professional negligence claim, albeit one pleaded under the Fair Trading Act, 1999 and the Trade Practices Act, [...]
Tags: Abuse of process · Fair Trading Act · Negligence · VCAT · VCAT Act · defences
WA Supreme Court says advocates’ immunity applies to misleading and deceptive conduct claims against lawyers
May 9th, 2007 · No Comments
In Alpine Holdings Ltd v Feinauer[2007] WASC 58, the Supreme Court of Western Australia gave very short shrift indeed to an argument that a statutory claim of misleading and deceptive conduct was not met by advocates’ immunity. The decision is interesting for this reason alone. It is also interesting because of:
the Court’s willingness to [...]
Tags: Advocates' Immunity · Barristers' immunity · Forensic immunity · Negligence · defences
High Court speaks on accrual of cause of action for negligence in pure economic loss case
April 22nd, 2007 · No Comments
On Friday, the High Court published a near unanimous judgment in Commonwealth of Australia v Cornwell [2007] HCA 16 on the accrual of a cause of action for negligence in which pure economic loss was claimed. I am yet to read the judgment properly, however it is apparent that a cause of action in negligence [...]
Tags: Limitations of actions · Negligence · defences

