Stephen Warne on professional negligence, regulation and discipline around the world

The Australian Professional Liability Blog random header image

Entries Tagged as 'civil-disciplinary interplay'

Distinguishing between civil and disciplinary complaints

June 4th, 2009 · No Comments

Tweet In the latest Byrne v Marles ([2009] VSC 210), Justice Beach seems to have found that any particular allegation made by a complainant may properly be characterised as both a civil and a disciplinary complaint.  If the Legal Services Commissioner receives a complaint, she must investigate it to the extent it is a disciplinary [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: civil-disciplinary interplay · costs disputes · Discipline · Legal Services Commissioner · Professional fees and disbursements

Criminal prosecutions (-not) by disciplinary authorities

April 22nd, 2009 · No Comments

Tweet The Building Practitioners Board is the Bureau de Spank for builders. It initiated an inquiry into whether a builder had breached a provision of the Building Act, 1993 (Vic.).  The provision prohibited builders from building without a permit.  Breach is a crime, but the Board is not entitled to prosecute offences under the Act, [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: civil-disciplinary interplay · Criminal liability · Discipline · judicial review

Solicitor gets three year break for multiple conflict findings

November 29th, 2008 · No Comments

Tweet In Legal Services Commissioner v DJMH [2008] VCAT 2301, Deputy President McNamara’s tribunal ordered the solicitor not to practice before 1 July 2011 for multiple findings of acting in the face of a conflict.  It is unfortunate that the reasons for decision do not allow an understanding of what was alleged.  It had something [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: civil-disciplinary interplay · common law · concurrent duties · conflicts · Discipline · duty and duty · Ethics · Misconduct

The practising certificate suspension challenge that went wrong

October 21st, 2008 · No Comments

Tweet Update, 8 November 2008: When I wrote this post, the Court of Appeal had authoritatively answered another of the questions posed below, about the penalty privileges, but I had not yet read the case, CT v Medical Practitioners Board [2008] VSCA 157.  Now I have, and I have posted here about it. Original post: [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: civil-disciplinary interplay · costs · Discipline · Misconduct · Practising certificates · procedure · Professional regulation · prosecutors' duties · regulators' duties · VCAT Act

Confirmed: your client can privately prosecute you for misconduct

June 3rd, 2007 · No Comments

Tweet Acting President Bowman handed down a decision on Friday in Cedric Naylor’s Case [2007] VCAT 958 approving the existing practice of VCAT, and before it the Legal Profession Tribunal, of entertaining professional misconduct allegations against lawyers by their clients as part of applications to set aside costs agreements. Entertaining them, that is, outside the [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: civil-disciplinary interplay · Discipline · jurisdiction · Legal Practice Act · Misconduct · procedure · Professional fees and disbursements · setting aside costs agreements · Unsatisfactory conduct

Can you be prosecuted for mere negligence?

January 17th, 2007 · No Comments

Tweet There is no doubt that mere negligence cannot constitute misconduct in the traditional concept of that expression: Myers v Elman [1940] AC 282 at 288; Re Hodgekiss (1959) 62 SR(NSW) 340 at 351; Re Veron (1966) 84 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 136 at 143 (CA); Re Miles (1966) 84 WN (Pt1) (NSW) 163 at [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: civil-disciplinary interplay · Discipline · Misconduct · negligence as disciplinary breach · Unsatisfactory conduct

Daming He’s experience of the legal regulators

December 16th, 2006 · No Comments

Tweet The unsuccessful complaint to the Legal Ombudsman, referred by her to the Victorian Bar, took more than 5 months to complete. Then the Law Institute complaint went on for about 2 months. The Legal Profession Tribunal made a decision 10 months later, the Full Legal Profession Tribunal 3 months later again. The Court of [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: civil-disciplinary interplay · Discipline · Legal Practice Act · Negligence · regulators' duties

The subject matter of Daming He’s complaint

December 16th, 2006 · No Comments

Tweet Update: 17 January 2008 VCAT has re-heard this case, and has made different findings of fact from some of those recounted below. See He v  A & Co Pty Ltd [2008] VCAT 3. Original post (This is part 2 of the post about He v A & Co Pty Ltd [2006] VSCA 150; [2006] [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: civil-disciplinary interplay · Discipline · Legal Practice Act · regulators' duties

Justice Gillard gives the Law Institute a bloody belting

April 10th, 2006 · 1 Comment

Tweet SPB v Law Institute of Victoria [2005] VSC 509 (Gillard J, 12 December 2005) s. 151(3)(c) Solicitors who read the back pages of the RPA News (dubbed the “sports pages”) well know the schadenfreude associated with the decisions of professional regulators. Rarely does one have such an enhanced opportunity for guilty pleasure in the [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: civil-disciplinary interplay · prosecutorial failures · regulators' duties · Uncategorized

A very generous approach to a Hungerfords damages claim tacked onto a misconduct prosecution

April 1st, 2006 · No Comments

Tweet Law Institute v KTBH [2006] VCAT 350 (Senior Member Howell) There were separate disciplinary and negligence proceedings against the solicitor over the same facts. At the end of the disciplinary hearing, and on the basis of the prosecutrix’s submissions, Mr Howell decided to determine the negligence case and get the whole thing over and [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: civil-disciplinary interplay · common law · Discipline · Misconduct · Negligence · prosecutors' duties · Unsatisfactory conduct