Stephen Warne on professional negligence, regulation and discipline around the world

The Australian Professional Liability Blog random header image

Entries Tagged as 'jurisdiction'

Supreme Courts’ inherent jurisdiction to discipline lawyers to be invoked sparingly

February 1st, 2010 · No Comments

In AM v Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal [2010] NTSC 02, a Full Court of the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory heard an appeal by way of rehearing into a decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal (see my earlier post on the case).  One of the grounds of appeal was that the Tribunal had not had [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Discipline · appeals · jurisdiction · procedure

Commissioner’s obligation to charge dishonesty if he intends to allege it

December 4th, 2009 · No Comments

Relatively recently, I posted on the question of whether a Bureau de Spank desiring to rely on a practitioner’s dishonesty or other form of conscious wrongdoing must expressly allege it in the charge, and discussed Walter v Council of Queensland Law Society Incorporated (1988) 77 ALR 228 at 234; [1988] HCA 8.  Now, in Legal [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Discipline · Ethics · Legal Profession Act · Legal Services Commissioner · Misconduct · Practising certificates · Professional regulation · Striking off · Trust money · amendment · appeals · concurrent duties · conflicts · current client and past client · duty and duty · jurisdiction · natural justice · procedure · trust monies · wilful disregard for rules

State Acts’ power to regulate local lawyers’ overseas conduct

April 17th, 2009 · No Comments

In Legal Practitioners Complaints Committee and MT QC [2009] WASAT 42, Judge Eckert’s 3 member tribunal considered the application to the Western Australian Legal Practice Act, 2003 of the laws relating to the power of state governments to make legislation regulating overseas conduct (i.e. ‘the law of extraterritoriality’).  Her Honour is Deputy President of the [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Discipline · Professional regulation · jurisdiction · procedure

What happens when complainant lodges complaint with wrong regulator and it gets transferred

May 31st, 2008 · No Comments

In Byrne v Marles [2008] VSCA 78, the subject of this earlier post, another issue arose. Justice Nettle confirmed that a complaint made to anyone other than the Commissioner is invalid as a trigger for the operation of the Legal Profession Act, 2004, but that if it finds its way to the Commissioner otherwise [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Discipline · Legal Services Commissioner · jurisdiction · procedure

Victorian Legal Services Commissioner’s 2006-2007 annual report

November 1st, 2007 · No Comments

The Legal Services Commissioner’s annual report went online today. You can download the pdf by clicking here. The big news is that she’s put 2 new blokes on the staff, but the blokes to sheila ratio has actually decreased (to 1 in 20).
In the year to 30 June 2007, the Commissioner’s staff of 45 [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Discipline · Legal Practice Act · Legal Profession Act · Legal Services Commissioner · Professional regulation · jurisdiction · procedure

Doctor’s opinion not given in trade or commerce so VCAT had no jurisdiction

June 27th, 2007 · No Comments

In a landmark decision with profound implications for VCAT’s Fair Trading Act, 1958 jurisdiction over lawyer-client disputes about professional negligence and fees, a Deputy President of VCAT has recognised that it did not have jurisdiction to hear a former client’s misleading and deceptive conduct claim brought against ‘a professional’ in the traditional sense of [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Fair Trading Act · Negligence · VCAT · defences · doctors · jurisdiction · procedure

Confirmed: your client can privately prosecute you for misconduct

June 3rd, 2007 · No Comments

Acting President Bowman handed down a decision on Friday in Cedric Naylor’s Case [2007] VCAT 958 approving the existing practice of VCAT, and before it the Legal Profession Tribunal, of entertaining professional misconduct allegations against lawyers by their clients as part of applications to set aside costs agreements. Entertaining them, that is, outside the disciplinary [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Discipline · Legal Practice Act · Misconduct · Professional fees and disbursements · Unsatisfactory conduct · civil-disciplinary interplay · jurisdiction · procedure · setting aside costs agreements

Judge Bowman explains Murray’s Case

May 15th, 2007 · No Comments

VCAT’s Acting President Judge Bowman today handed down a long and important decision in relation to the relationship between alleged failures to follow the procedures for investigating complaints against professionals laid down by legislation and the jurisdiction of the disciplinary tribunal to hear charges laid as a result of such investigations. After eight months’ thought, [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Discipline · VCAT · jurisdiction · procedure · regulators' duties

VCAT’s jurisdiction over post-proceedings Family Law fees

March 2nd, 2007 · No Comments

Senior Member Howell determined today in M v JC Lawyers [2007] VCAT 273 that VCAT had jurisdiction to entertain a costs dispute about solicitor-client fees of post-proceedings negotiations under the threat of mutual applications to reopen under the change of circumstances provisions the final orders of the Family Court made 9 years previously.

[Read more →]

Tags: Legal Profession Act · Professional fees and disbursements · costs disputes · jurisdiction

Staying disciplinary proceedings as abuses of process

January 17th, 2007 · No Comments

Update, 23 December 2009: Doubt is cast on the correctness of Hunt AJA’s comments by Hodgson JA, the other justices of appeal agreeing, in Council of the NSW Bar Association (2008) 72 NSWLR 236 at 249 ([40]).
Original post: The following passage from the NSW Court of Appeal’s decision in Lindsay v Health Care Complaints Commission [...]

[Read more →]

Tags: Abuse of process · Uncategorized · autrefois acquit · jurisdiction · procedure