‘Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?’, a Melbourne lawyer’s criminal law blog, explained the criminal law rule against duplicity here. I am not much interested in it from a professional discipline point of view, and it seems the courts tend not to get over-excited about it either (though the lawyer made some progress with it in Law [...]
Entries Tagged as 'prosecutors' duties'
The rule against duplicity in disciplinary charges
March 1st, 2010 · 1 Comment
Tags: Discipline · natural justice · procedure · prosecutors' duties
Disciplinary charges and intentional wrongdoing
October 29th, 2009 · No Comments
Update, 4 December 2009: see now Legal Services Commissioner v Madden (No 2) [2008] QCA 301. What the Queensland Court of Appeal said there about Walter’s Case, the subject of this post, is reproduced at the end of the post.
Original post: Does a lawyer’s Bureau de Spank have to say in a charge in a [...]
Tags: Discipline · Misconduct · Unsatisfactory conduct · natural justice · procedure · prosecutorial failures · prosecutors' duties · reckless disregard for rules · trust monies · wilful disregard for rules
Doctors, psychologists, sex and former patients
September 7th, 2009 · No Comments
In Re a Psychologist [2009] TASSC 70, the Supreme Court of Tasmania quashed a decision of the Psychologists Registration Board of Tasmania to suspend a psychologist for 6 months for entering into a sexual relationship with a former patient fewer than 2 years after the end of the therapeutic relationship. In fact he married her. [...]
Tags: "disgraceful and dishonourable" · Discipline · Misconduct · amendment · doctors · natural justice · procedure · prosecutorial failures · prosecutors' duties
Offences created by the Legal Profession Act, 2004
August 13th, 2009 · No Comments
Note: I drafted this post last financial year. Since then, the value of a penalty unit increased today by about 3%, to $116.82, with the result that the dollar figures referred to below will be commensurately too low. See the details at Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes.
Original post: I acted for a fellow whom the Law [...]
Tags: Criminal liability · Legal Profession Act · prosecutors' duties · regulators' duties
Commissioner’s unexplained delay reduces penalty for serious misconduct
August 6th, 2009 · No Comments
Speaking of the need for speed as Justice Heydon and I were on this blog yesterday, there are two other instances worthy of reporting.
First, the High Court has recently considered the need for speed in criminal proceedings, and were not nearly as excited about it as in commercial litigation. This time, they rolled the court [...]
Tags: Discipline · Legal Services Commissioner · Misconduct · costs · mental illness · procedure · prosecutors' duties · regulators' duties · trust monies
A new text on professional discipline
April 29th, 2009 · No Comments
Lovegrove & Lord’s Kim Lovegrove and barrister Sav Korica have just published a little book called Disciplinary Hearings and Advocacy (Hybrid, 2009). It sells for $39.95. Lovegrove is the Chairman of the Building Practitioners Board, and presides over disciplinary hearings. I suspect that frustration with other decision makers’ decision making (‘there may exist some, particularly [...]
Tags: Discipline · Professional regulation · doctors · procedure · prosecutors' duties
Inferences arising from failure to call a witness for fear of what they would say
April 19th, 2009 · No Comments
Even though I can remember little about them, I know that two of my favourite books are the 18 year old Francoise Sagan’s Bonjour Tristesse and Helen Garner’s The Children’s Bach. They are both short. A book is a good book when you can finish it in one bath. Entertaining as Justice Owen’s judgment writing [...]
Tags: Discipline · procedure · prosecutors' duties
Da Fink reckons the Bureau should act with the fairness of Crown prosecutors
November 7th, 2008 · No Comments
In Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Mining Projects Group Limited [2007] FCA 1620, Justice Ray Finkelstein, aka da Fink, sowed a seed for future courts to take up and declare that regulatory authorities bringing civil penalty proceedings should have the same duties as criminal prosecutors. Having cited the authority to say that they do [...]
Tags: Criminal liability · Discipline · procedure · prosecutors' duties · regulators' duties
The practising certificate suspension challenge that went wrong
October 21st, 2008 · No Comments
Update, 8 November 2008: When I wrote this post, the Court of Appeal had authoritatively answered another of the questions posed below, about the penalty privileges, but I had not yet read the case, CT v Medical Practitioners Board [2008] VSCA 157. Now I have, and I have posted here about it.
Original post: WPE v [...]
Tags: Discipline · Misconduct · Practising certificates · Professional regulation · VCAT Act · civil-disciplinary interplay · costs · procedure · prosecutors' duties · regulators' duties
The right to silence in disciplinary and striking off hearings
August 31st, 2008 · No Comments
I have previously posted about the QC who took his computer into work at the DPP only to lose his career when the tech found child pornography on it. It was a bizarre story, and of course there was a twist which has become clear from the disciplinary decision in Council of the NSW [...]
Tags: Criminal liability · Misconduct · Practising certificates · Striking off · procedure · prosecutors' duties

