Stephen Warne on professional negligence, regulation and discipline around the world

The Australian Professional Liability Blog random header image

Entries Tagged as 'Evidence'

Jury verdict overturned by VSCA because of insinuation in cross-examination without adequate factual foundation

September 10th, 2014 · No Comments

In Green v Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority [2014] VSCA 207, the Victorian Court of Appeal today overturned a jury’s verdict following a nine-day trial. There had been a miscarriage of justice occasioned by the manner in which the plaintiff was cross-examined by the defendant’s trial counsel.  He had made an allegation of recent invention involving […]

[Read more →]

Tags: Alleging fraud & misconduct · duties regarding witnesses · duty to court · Ethics · Evidence · litigation ethics

R v Milat: A Case Study in Cross-Examination

September 6th, 2014 · No Comments

British backpacker Paul Onions got away from Ivan Milat on 25 January 1990, after Milat pulled a gun on him after giving him a lift.  He ran off, zigzagging to avoid being shot to death and managed to hail a passing motorist as Milat’s shot missed him.  The police did not do anything much in […]

[Read more →]

Tags: Evidence · Legal writing

To accept a reprimand or not to accept a reprimand?

June 17th, 2014 · No Comments

Following a disciplinary investigation, Victoria’s Legal Services Commissioner must form an opinion as to the likelihood of VCAT finding the lawyer guilty of conduct warranting discipline.  If he is satisfied that there is a reasonable likelihood of VCAT finding the lawyer guilty of something, his options depend on what that something is.  If it’s professional misconduct, […]

[Read more →]

Tags: Discipline · Evidence

Self-represented solicitor guilty of misconduct for breaching a rule expressed to regulate conduct when acting for a client

May 29th, 2014 · No Comments

A Western Australian disciplinary case, Legal Profession Complaints Committee v CSA [2014] WASAT 57 is interesting in a number of ways. A criminal lawyer was the manager of a strata corporation.  She owned two units and the complainant the third. The complainant affixed an airconditioner to a wall which impeded on a common area.  She […]

[Read more →]

Tags: Abuse of process · Briginshaw · Discipline · Dishonesty · duty to court · Evidence · jurisdiction · litigation ethics · Misconduct · procedure · The suit for fees

Clyne v NSW Bar Association: the leading case on unfounded allegations

February 11th, 2014 · No Comments

Clyne v New South Wales Bar Association (1960) 104 CLR 186; [1960] HCA 40 is a unanimous decision of the Dixon Court confirming the striking off of a Sydney barrister, Peter Clyne, for making unfounded and serious allegations on behalf of a husband against the wife’s solicitor in matrimonial litigation for the admitted purpose of […]

[Read more →]

Tags: "disgraceful and dishonourable" · Abuse of process · Alleging fraud & misconduct · Discipline · duty to court · Ethics · Evidence · Legal writing · litigation ethics · Misconduct · prosecutors' duties · Striking off

What is a signature?

July 14th, 2013 · 1 Comment

I have spent too much of the last couple of years considering what it is for a person to sign a document, as a result of a disciplinary prosecution of my solicitor client for forgery after he wrote his wife’s name on a guarantee pursuant to a written authority and then signed his name as […]

[Read more →]

Tags: Evidence

Suburban solicitor tenders video of himself asking employee for sex 78 times in his own sexual harrassment case

March 28th, 2013 · No Comments

A solicitor somewhere in Melbourne’s suburbs failed in his defence of sexual harrassment claims and was ordered by VCAT’s President, Justice Garde, to pay his victim compensation of $100,000: GLS v PLP [2013] VCAT 221.  The solicitor described the complainant as a fantasist when she said that he asked her for sex in a most […]

[Read more →]

Tags: Briginshaw · Evidence · VCAT · VCAT Act

VCAT’s President, Justice Garde, lays out the law of the rule in Briginshaw v Briginshaw

March 28th, 2013 · No Comments

As I mention in this post, Justice Garde, VCAT’s new President, set out the law relating to the application in cases involving allegations of serious wrongdoing of the civil standard of proof helpfully and authoritatively in GLS v PLP [2012] VCAT 221: ‘The standard of proof This case concerns serious allegations levelled against Mr PLP, […]

[Read more →]

Tags: Briginshaw · Discipline · Evidence

Pimply youth’s fraudster Father Christmas Avondale Heights outrage

February 11th, 2013 · 1 Comment

The Victorian Court of Appeal has reversed the decision of a County Court Judge awarding $80,000 to a Father Christmas who was kicked in the knee by a pimply youth on his way from his throne to his dressing room. Judge Smith’s decision is here, the Court of Appeal’s here (Bainbridge v James [2013] VSCA […]

[Read more →]

Tags: Evidence

Privilege in a time sheet?

May 17th, 2011 · No Comments

Can a lawyer’s bill be subject to client legal privilege (the Evidence Act, 2008‘s equivalent of the common law’s legal professional privilege)? Can a lawyer’s time sheet be privileged? Yes, if they disclose privileged information, the Supreme Court’s Justice Vickery has reiterated in Hodgson v Amcor Ltd [2011] VSC 204 at [53] to [65] (despite […]

[Read more →]

Tags: Client Legal Privilege · Evidence · Professional fees and disbursements · Solicitor client bills of costs