Tweet I was already a fan of the first edition of Judge Stephen Walmsley SC, Alister Abadee, and Ben Zipser‘s excellent Professional Liability in Australia, published by Thomson, and had been waiting for the new edition with interest. I got myself a copy the other day. It’s good, and there are substantial additions since the [...]
Entries Tagged as 'two bites at the cherry'
2nd edition of Professional Liability in Australia reviewed
October 18th, 2007 · No Comments
Tags: Advocates' Immunity · Barristers' immunity · Book reviews · Causation · conflicts · defences · Discipline · doctors · duties of confidentiality · Duties to third parties · Ethics · Fair Trading Act · Fiduciary duties · Forensic immunity · Legal Profession Act · legal professional privilege · Legal writing · Limitations of actions · Misconduct · Negligence · Professional regulation · Proportionate Liability · Retainers · Striking off · two bites at the cherry · Uncategorized · Wasted costs
Res judicata: VCAT strikes out case previously decided by Legal Profession Tribunal
November 27th, 2006 · No Comments
Tweet Wells’s Case [2006] VCAT 2370 (Senior Member Howell, 16 November 2006) I have always thought I was the only person in the world who held the view that an unsuccessful claimant in the Legal Profession Tribunal was not allowed, despite s. 133(2) of the Legal Practice Act, 1996 to have a second go in [...]
Tags: defences · Fair Trading Act · Legal Practice Act · Negligence · two bites at the cherry · VCAT Act
Mr Howell releases Client from implied undertaking as to documents
November 13th, 2006 · No Comments
Tweet Alessi’s Case is a long-running application to set aside a costs agreement commenced in the Legal Profession Tribunal in 2003. The Alessis succeeded in having their solicitor’s costs agreement cancelled and two bills set aside in [2005] VLPT 18. The latest decision — [2006] VCAT 149 is just a little one about an application [...]
Tags: litigation ethics · Negligence · two bites at the cherry
Open offer under cover of denial of negligence averts hearing
May 5th, 2006 · 1 Comment
Tweet Chen’s Case [2006] VCAT 748 (Senior Member Howell): costs; s. 132(b); s. 133(2); s. 407 (see the associated disciplinary decision here) A solicitor averted being found negligent by openly offering to pay the claimant the maximum amount VCAT could award under cover of a denial of negligence. Mr Howell found that it would not [...]
Tags: costs · Legal Practice Act · Negligence · two bites at the cherry

