Solicitors and barristers are obliged not to make allegations of criminality, fraud or other serious wrongdoing in ‘court documents’ without an adequate factual foundation. The rule for Victorian barristers is rule 34. This post explores what ‘court documents’ are, what ‘fraud’ means in this context, and what an adequate factual foundation is, in part by [...]
Entries Tagged as 'litigation ethics'
The obligation not to allege ‘fraud’ without an appropriate evidentiary foundation: what is ‘fraud’?
January 27th, 2010 · 1 Comment
Tags: Ethics · Vic Solis' Conduct Rules · litigation ethics
$19,500 fine for making complaint against lawyer without adequate evidentiary foundation
January 26th, 2010 · No Comments
A Full Court of the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory delivered judgment in AM v Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Authority [2010] NTSC 02 a week ago. The Darwin lawyer, AM, lodged a complaint with the NT Law Society alleging that a competitor firm, Cridlands, which used to act for her client, had acted in the [...]
Tags: Discipline · Ethics · Misconduct · appeals · litigation ethics
‘Snapping on’ judgment in default
December 10th, 2009 · No Comments
I must say I was brought up believing that there was nothing at all wrong with rushing down to the court’s registry and entering default judgment if an appearance, or defence, was not filed by the due date. Apart from anything else, you force the other side to set out enough on oath about their [...]
Tags: Abuse of process · Ethics · Party party costs · litigation ethics
VCAT explores definition of professional misconduct at common law unconnected with legal practice
August 7th, 2009 · No Comments
In Legal Services Commissioner v RAP [2009] VCAT 1200, the Bureau failed to establish a charge of professional misconduct at common law against a solicitor in respect of conduct which occurred otherwise than in the course of, and unconnected with, legal practice. (Another charge, not the subject of this post, succeeded.) The allegation was that [...]
Tags: "disgraceful and dishonourable" · Criminal liability · Discipline · Ethics · Legal Profession Act · Misconduct · common law · litigation ethics · prosecutorial failures
Litigation takes speed
August 5th, 2009 · 1 Comment
Adjournment applications and applications to amend out of time in civil proceedings just got more difficult. I have a feeling that the first time I said anything in court after I came to the Bar was an expression, to the Supreme Court’s Master Efthim, of how melancholy I felt about regrettably having little choice but [...]
Tags: Ethics · litigation ethics
House of Lords restates law of negotiation (or ‘without prejudice’) privilege
May 9th, 2009 · No Comments
I reckon Dr Desiatnik is unlucky with the timing of his texts. The first edition of Legal Professional Privilege in Australia was finished when the High Court changed the test for the privilege from a sole purpose to dominant purpose and restated the law of implied waiver. I have always shuddered about the story one [...]
Tags: Ethics · Negotiation privilege · Out of court settlements · duties of confidentiality · litigation ethics
Solicitor prosecuted for breach of rule in Browne v Dunne
May 8th, 2009 · No Comments
Bizarre man. A Queensland solicitor has been found guilty of professional misconduct for not obeying the rule in Browne v Dunne (well, amongst other things): Legal Services Commissioner v MPD [2009] LPT 08. Here are the reasons:
‘[18] in July 2004, [Mr Dryland] retained the respondent to resist an application for an apprehended violence order. [19] [...]
Tags: Discipline · Ethics · Misconduct · duties regarding witnesses · litigation ethics
Is the draft witness statement held by the witness privileged?
November 16th, 2008 · No Comments
Justice Finkelstein’s decision in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Mining Projects Group Limited [2007] FCA 1620 has provided material for the last 2 posts. Now, a third. His Honour had to consider a question I have never been too sure about. Say there is a case on foot, but it’s long before trial. A [...]
Tags: duties regarding witnesses · litigation ethics
Vexation
October 5th, 2008 · 1 Comment
An article by Peter Munro in The Age provides a surprisingly sophisticated analysis of the ‘problem’ of vexatious litigants. The unrepresented obsessed do pose problems for the administration of justice. Consider the web of litigation sketched out in Mentyn v Law Society of Tasmania [2004] TASSC 24.
Tags: Abuse of process · litigation ethics
The implied undertaking yields to compulsion; relevance to a second proceeding a powerful ’special circumstance’
August 1st, 2008 · No Comments
Justice Pagone’s decision in Griffiths & Beerens Pty Ltd v Duggan [2008] VSC 230 came along just at the very moment I needed to find out the answer to a question I have always been unsure about. Say you have documents from one proceeding obtained from the other side on discovery. They are [...]
Tags: Ethics · duties of confidentiality · duties regarding witnesses · duty to court · litigation ethics

