A costs judge of the English High Court handed down a decision about the recoverability in insurance litigation of insurance loss adjusters’ fees. An interesting article from CMS Cameron McKenna about the case is reproduced below. In an effort to find a link to an online version of the case, I found this webpage of Paramount Costs Consultants, with notes about English cases about costs. Here’s the article in full:
‘Recovery of costs in litigation: loss adjusters’ fees
Where a loss adjuster is instructed by an insurer to investigate a claim against the insured, those costs may not be recoverable from the other side even in the event of a successful costs order against the other side in any subsequent litigation.
According to a decision of a costs judge in a recent case:
- Where the loss adjuster is instructed by the insurer, this is not a recoverable cost since it is the insurer’s liability not the insured’s. The insured is the party to the litigation. It is the insured’s costs which are recoverable. Subrogation does not help the insurer since this only allows the insurer to step into the shoes of the insured. The insured has no liability for the loss adjuster’s fees. There is therefore no loss to the insured for the insurer to indemnify and then be subrogated to;
- Where a loss adjuster undertakes work prior to a solicitor being appointed, the costs will not be recoverable in any event if the work is such that would normally be completed by a solicitor;
- Where a solicitor has been appointed, such work by a loss adjuster may be recoverable but as a cost not a disbursement. The court will, however, be looking for an agency relationship, evidenced by an agreement, between the solicitor and the loss adjuster;
- The position may be different if the loss adjuster is engaged to undertake work which a solicitor would NOT normally undertake. In that situation, the loss adjuster’s costs may be treated as akin to expert fees, and therefore be recoverable as a disbursement (whether undertaken before or after the instruction of a solicitor).
Further reading: see Cuthbert v Gair & Gair (t/a The Bowes Manor Equestrian Centre) (2008) SCCO 03/09/08.’
The decision is also reported as  EWHC 90114 (Costs).
- More on hire car costs as damages for loss of the use of a chattel in motor vehicle property damage cases
- A non-exhaustive bibliography on lawyers’ conflicts of duties between insurer and insured
- Appeal succeeds in Lawcover indemnity dispute with entrepeneurial solicitor
- Getting documents out of insurers
- Applications to waive fees are not party party costs
One Reply to “Costs of insurance loss adjusters”
The Victorian Supreme court case of Sophiadakis v Reljic  VSC 147 is relevant and also holds that work done by a unqualified person, which should have been done by a solicitor, is not recoverable.
In part due to this decision, the Supreme Court practice note on use of technology specifically states that the cost of engaging external technology consultants may be recovered as costs of proceedings.